10. Scenario Analysis
Overview
This module introduces participants to scenario analysis as a tool for exploring the potential implications of different intervention, funding, or policy choices. Participants learn how scenarios are developed, compared, and interpreted to support strategic planning and decision-making under uncertainty.
By the end of this module, participants should be able to:
Understand scenario analysis and how it is used in modelling
Design meaningful and realistic scenarios
Interpret and compare scenario results
Baseline and alternative scenarios
Comparing interventions and strategies
Assumptions and uncertainty in scenarios
Strategic planning and prioritisation
Decision-making under uncertainty
Delivery Plan
The teaching component of this module consists of a single 1.5-hour session, with a mix of presentation and exercise. However, themes from this module will be revisited in subsequent modules, discussed further in the Interpreting Model Outputs module, and applied in the Capstone Projects.
| Topic | Description | Duration | Format |
| Introduction to Scenario Analysis | Purpose and value of scenarios Scenarios, forecasts and projections Establishing counterfactuals |
20 min | Presentation |
| Designing Scenarios | Defining assumptions and comparisons Ensuring realism and policy relevance Costing scenarios Worked examples |
20 min | Presentation and worked example discussion |
| Interactive Exercise | Participants develop and compare scenarios for SMC modelling question | 40 min | Small group break out exercise |
| Reflection and Wrap-Up | Key considerations for scenario design and use Using scenarios to inform decisions |
10 min | Discussion |
Practical Exercise
Exercise Title: Designing Scenarios for SMC
Instructions:
Participants work in groups to consider the following modelling question: What is the expected health impact and cost over 5 years (2026 - 2030) of introducing SMC through door-to-door delivery or health facilities?
Develop a set of scenarios to explore to support answering this question. Define your baseline and identify the outcome measures of interest.
Consider:
High prevalence vs moderate prevalence settings
Coverage (conservative vs optimistic)
Consider an appropriate counterfactual scenario
Climate assumptions
With or without ITN use
Groups present and compare scenarios and key assumptions informing their choices.
Facilitator Guidance
Encourage realistic and decision-focused scenarios
Reinforce that scenarios are exploratory, not predictions
Highlight the importance of communicating assumptions clearly
Use examples linked to resource allocation or intervention planning
Materials and Resources
Malaria programme case studies
Facilitator slides